|
Alex Smart |
|
|---|---|---|
| Alex Smart Sports- Where winning means everything! |
| YESTERDAY'S PLAYS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Matchup | Selection | W/L |
|
NHL | Jan 17, 2026 Rangers vs Flyers |
Flyers -135 at circa |
Lost $135.0 |
| Play Type: Free | ||
|
In the competitive landscape of NHL betting this 2025-2026 season, home favorites have emerged as a powerhouse angle, securing outright victories at a robust 56.9% rate while road underdogs scrape by with just a 43.1% win percentage across the league. This dynamic sets the stage perfectly for the Philadelphia Flyers, who welcome the faltering New York Rangers in a Metropolitan Division showdown where home ice and momentum could tip the scales decisively. League-wide, divisional matchups have leaned toward home teams on the moneyline in over 55% of cases, especially when the visitors are mired in slumps, with one-goal decisions comprising nearly 42% of outcomes and underscoring the value in backing resilient hosts who exploit familiar surroundings to stifle comebacks. Philadelphia, sitting at 22-16-8 overall, has been scorching hot at home with five straight wins on their turf, bolstering a strong 12-7-5 home record that highlights their ability to dictate pace and generate offense at 2.89 goals per game while holding opponents to 3.04. The Flyers' shot dominance, averaging 26.0 attempts for and allowing just 25.3 against, mirrors broader NHL trends where home squads controlling the rubber limit high-danger chances and force low-event games, even as their power play hovers at a modest 15% efficiency. Their penalty kill, ranked in the middle third at 77.8%, has been a quiet strength, aligning with patterns where home teams kill off over 78% of shorthanded situations in winning efforts against divisional rivals. Meanwhile, the Rangers (20-22-6) have dropped six of their last eight, exposing vulnerabilities on the road despite a respectable 15-9-2 away split, as injuries to stars like goaltender Igor Shesterkin and defenseman Adam Fox have left them leaning on backups like Jonathan Quick, who carries a dismal 3-10-2 record and .887 save percentage. New York's offensive output lags at 2.58 goals per game, and their recent skid has seen them concede over three goals per contest, fitting league-wide stats where road teams without key personnel win just 35% of games against home favorites. This mismatch plays into betting trends favoring hosts against slumping visitors, particularly in games where the under has hit in 60% of Rangers' outings featuring subpar goaltending. Delving into team-specific angles, Philadelphia boasts a 27-19 mark against the spread this season, excelling at keeping contests tight and capitalizing on home crowds to force overtime or narrow triumphs, while the Rangers sit at 22-26 ATS, often crumbling in the third period during road tests. Head-to-head history shows New York with a 7-3 edge in the last 10, but recent clashes have trended toward high-intensity battles where home advantage flips the script, with overs cashing in half those meetings amid defensive lapses. Ultimately, the moneyline wager on the Flyers at -135 emerges as a compelling selection, fusing dominant league home favorite trends with Philadelphia's home surge and New York's road woes. In a campaign defined by home ice translating to over 56% win rates, this matchup positions the Flyers to snap any lingering doubts and deliver a statement victory. |
||
| Matchup | Selection | W/L |
|
NCAA-B | Jan 17, 2026 Nebraska vs Northwestern |
Nebraska -5½ -110 at Buckeye |
Won $100 |
| Play Type: Free | ||
|
Big Ten basketball has emphasized defensive battles this season, with underdogs in conference games covering the spread 51% of the time, but favorites like Nebraska have dominated when facing struggling squads. The No. 8 Cornhuskers, undefeated at 17-0, bring a suffocating defense allowing just 65.8 points per game, the second-best in the league, into their matchup against Northwestern, who sit at 0-6 in Big Ten play. League trends show top-10 teams covering as road favorites 62% against winless conference foes, a spot where Nebraska's five wins over top-40 KenPom teams give them a clear edge. Northwestern has lost eight straight against high-major opponents, posting a 6-11 ATS record overall, while Nebraska is 10-7 ATS and perfect straight up. |
||
| Matchup | Selection | W/L |
|
NHL | Jan 17, 2026 Predators vs Golden Knights |
Predators +1½ -115 at PlayMGM |
Lost $115.0 |
| Play Type: Premium | ||
|
In the fast-paced world of NHL betting, underdogs on the puck line have proven to be a reliable angle this 2025-2026 season, with league-wide statistics showing that teams catching +1.5 goals cover at around a 60% clip overall. This trend holds particularly strong for road underdogs like the Nashville Predators, who face the Vegas Golden Knights in a Saturday night matchup where fatigue and form could keep things closer than the lines suggest. Across the league, away teams have won outright just 43.4% of the time, but they've excelled at hanging tough, covering the spread in over 54% of games and pushing many contests to overtime or single-goal decisions. With totals trending under in about 57% of games set at 6.5 goals, bettors have found value in backing resilient visitors who capitalize on defensive stands and timely goaltending to avoid blowouts. Nashville enters this tilt as a clear underdog, but their road performance this season—9 wins, 10 losses, and 2 overtime setbacks—underscores a gritty approach that has kept them competitive away from home. The Predators have rattled off four straight-up victories in their last five outings, including impressive showings against tough Central Division foes, where they've limited opponents to an average of under three goals per game during that stretch. Goaltender Juuse Saros has been the backbone, posting an 18-15-3 record with a 2.93 goals-against average and a .897 save percentage through 36 starts, often stepping up in high-pressure road environments to steal points. This resilience aligns with broader NHL patterns where teams like Nashville, boasting a balanced attack and strong penalty kill (ranking in the top third league-wide at over 79%), frequently cover as underdogs by forcing low-scoring affairs or extending games beyond regulation. On the flip side, Vegas has been formidable at home with an 11-6-6 record, leveraging their speed and depth to outscore opponents in front of raucous crowds. However, the Golden Knights are riding a six-game winning streak that includes back-to-back overtime thrillers, most recently a 6-5 comeback against Toronto on January 15 after edging Los Angeles 3-2 the night before. This marks their second game in as many nights, a scenario where NHL teams have struggled this season, with the league seeing an uptick in back-to-backs averaging about one more per team compared to last year, often leading to dips in 5-on-5 efficiency and higher goals-against rates due to fatigue. Vegas ranks middling in 5-on-5 play lately, allowing over three goals per game in their last six, which opens the door for Nashville's opportunistic style to keep the margin slim. Digging deeper into team-specific betting angles, the Predators have covered the puck line in 11 of their last 12 games as underdogs, a testament to their ability to battle in close contests and avoid multi-goal defeats. Meanwhile, home favorites like Vegas have covered at just a 41.8% rate against the spread this season, often failing to pull away when facing determined road squads. The over has hit in six of the last nine head-to-head meetings in Vegas, but with both teams emphasizing structure—Nashville allowing the fewest high-danger chances per 60 minutes on the road and the Knights showing signs of wear from their recent schedule—this one profiles as a grind-it-out affair where the Predators stay within a goal. All told, the puck line play on Nashville +1.5 at -115 stands out as a sharp choice, blending league-wide underdog success on the spread with the Predators' road tenacity and Saros' steady presence against a potentially tired Vegas side. In a season where blowouts are down and one-goal games make up over 40% of outcomes, this setup favors the visitors covering and keeping bettors in the green. |
||
| Matchup | Selection | W/L |
|
NBA | Jan 17, 2026 Pacers vs Pistons |
Pistons -12 -110 at circa |
Won $100 |
| Play Type: Premium | ||
|
In the NBA's competitive landscape this season, where home-court advantage has proven particularly potent for favored teams, the matchup between the Detroit Pistons and Indiana Pacers on January 17 stands out as a prime opportunity for bettors eyeing substantial spreads. Detroit, boasting a commanding 29-10 record through the first half of the campaign, has emerged as one of the Eastern Conference's elite squads, consistently overpowering opponents with a balanced attack and stingy defense. Their home games at Little Caesars Arena have been especially dominant, where they've covered the spread in 11 of 20 contests, reflecting a broader league trend in which home favorites of 10 points or more have succeeded against the spread at a 58% clip overall this year. This success aligns with the NBA's ongoing emphasis on efficient scoring, as teams like the Pistons have capitalized on high-paced play to average 117.6 points per game, just shy of the league's inflated offensive outputs driven by increased three-point attempts across the board. Contrast that with Indiana's dismal 10-32 mark, positioning them as the league's most beleaguered outfit and highlighting their vulnerabilities on the road, where they've dropped games by double digits in roughly 80% of outings. The Pacers' defensive woes are glaring, surrendering 118.3 points per contest while opponents shoot 48.3% from the field, a statistic that ranks among the worst in a season where defensive efficiency has separated contenders from also-rans. Their against-the-spread performance reflects this struggle, with only 22 covers in 42 games, and a particularly poor 10-11 record as road underdogs, often failing to keep pace in divisional clashes. League-wide, underdogs of this magnitude have covered just 42% of the time when facing top-tier home teams, underscoring the challenges for squads like Indiana that rank dead last in net rating and have hit the under in seven of their last 10 tilts due to offensive inconsistencies. From a betting angle, this Central Division rivalry amplifies the value in backing Detroit, as home teams in intradivision games have covered at a 56% rate this season, particularly when the spread exceeds 10 points and the favorite holds a winning percentage north of .700. The Pistons' recent form bolsters this, with a 6-4 straight-up record over their past 10 and a knack for blowing out inferior opponents, including a history of covering large lines at home where they've gone 14-17 as favorites but with stronger results against sub-.500 foes. Meanwhile, Indiana's road trips have been marred by turnovers and poor rebounding, allowing opponents to pull away in the second half—a pattern seen in league trends where struggling visitors concede an average of 12.4 more points away from home. Public betting leans heavily toward Detroit, with over three-quarters of the handle on the Pistons to cover, yet this consensus hasn't deterred sharp action, as similar scenarios have paid off for favorites in 62% of instances this year when the line sits between 10 and 15 points. Factoring in these dynamics, the Pistons -12.5 at -112 odds presents a compelling wager, capitalizing on Detroit's home dominance and Indiana's systemic road collapses in a season where such mismatches have reliably delivered for bettors attuned to these trends. While the total hovers around 225.5, pointing to another high-scoring affair amid the NBA's 115.5 points-per-game average, the spread here edges out as the stronger play given the lopsided team trajectories. |
||
| Matchup | Selection | W/L |
|
NCAA-B | Jan 17, 2026 Duke vs Stanford |
Duke -9½ -110 at Buckeye |
Won $100 |
| Play Type: Premium | ||
|
The ACC's cross-country travel has created unique betting dynamics this season, with road favorites covering 54% when facing teams outside the top 100 in defensive efficiency,a category Stanford falls into. No. 6 Duke, at 16-1 and 5-0 in conference, boasts an offense averaging 85.8 points on 49.5% shooting, led by Cameron Boozer's 22.8 points per game, as they visit the Cardinal. League trends favor high-scoring affairs in ACC games with totals under 150 hitting the over 57%, but Duke's defensive prowess, holding foes to 65.9 points (17th nationally), could cap Stanford's output. The Blue Devils are 5-0 on the road straight up, while Stanford's 3-2 ATS as home underdogs shows vulnerability against elite talent. Duke's trends include a 3-8 ATS in their last 11 but 5-0 SU in their last five, with an 8-0 SU run against ACC opponents. Stanford allows 71.7 points per game and shoots 43.5% from the field, ranking outside the top 100 defensively, which Duke exploits with their 34.6% 3-point accuracy. Statistically, Duke covers as double-digit favorites 60% when opponents turn the ball over above league average, a spot Stanford hits with their 12.4 turnovers per game. The Cardinal's 9-3 home record is solid, but against ranked teams, they've gone 1-4 ATS in the last five. With 68% of bets on Duke, the spread has held steady, indicating value in laying the points. In a conference where top-10 teams win by double digits 65% on the road against sub-.500 ACC squads, Duke's talent and efficiency make them a strong play to cover. |
||
| Matchup | Selection | W/L |
|
NCAA-B | Jan 17, 2026 Virginia vs SMU |
Virginia -1 -115 at betus |
Won $100 |
| Play Type: Premium | ||
|
ACC road games have been a bettor's minefield this season, with favorites covering just 48% of the time away from home, a trend that underscores the importance of defensive efficiency and rebounding in hostile environments. The Virginia Cavaliers, ranked No. 16, fit this profile perfectly as they head to face the SMU Mustangs, where Virginia's stingy defense—fourth in the ACC for scoring allowed—could stifle SMU's offense. League-wide, ACC contests featuring top-20 teams have seen the under hit 60% of the time when the total is set above 150, reflecting a shift toward slower-paced, grind-it-out affairs. Virginia has won and covered in four straight games, boasting a 3-1 road record, while SMU has lost and failed to cover in two of their last three, hampered by turnover issues that rank them outside the top 150 nationally. Virginia's betting angles shine through their dominance on the boards: they lead the ACC in offensive rebounding and rank second in 3-point shooting, creating efficient scoring opportunities even on the road. SMU, despite an 11-game home win streak, has a 3-3 ATS mark in their last six as underdogs, and their free-throw shooting woes could prove costly in close finishes. Statistically, Virginia covers when favored by 1.5 points or more at a 57% rate this season, aligning with a broader trend where ACC road favorites with top-50 defenses cover 55% against teams with turnover rates above 18%. SMU's 21-turnover performance against Duke earlier this year highlights this vulnerability, and Virginia's pressure defense, which forces turnovers on 19% of possessions, could exploit it further. Public consensus shows about 62% of bets on Virginia, but line stability suggests sharp money favors the Cavaliers' balanced approach over SMU's home-court reliance. With Virginia holding opponents to under 40% shooting in recent wins and SMU ranking outside the top 100 in defensive efficiency, this matchup tilts toward Virginia covering the small spread. Bettors should note the Cavaliers' 8-6 ATS record as favorites, providing a reliable trend in a conference where road teams with superior rebounding margins win outright 68% of the time. |
||
| Matchup | Selection | W/L |
|
NCAA-B | Jan 17, 2026 Arkansas vs Georgia |
Arkansas +2½ -105 at Bovada |
Lost $105.0 |
| Play Type: Premium | ||
|
The SEC conference slate continues to deliver intriguing matchups, and Saturday's clash between the Arkansas Razorbacks and Georgia Bulldogs exemplifies the volatility of college basketball betting, where underdogs have frequently outperformed expectations. League-wide trends in the SEC this season show underdogs covering the spread in approximately 52% of conference games, particularly when facing teams with inflated scoring averages but softer non-conference schedules. Arkansas enters as a slight underdog, but their battle-tested resume provides a compelling angle: the Razorbacks have navigated the 27th-toughest schedule nationally, posting a 3-4 record in Quad 1 games, which highlights their ability to compete against elite competition. In contrast, Georgia boasts the nation's top scoring offense at 96.4 points per game, yet their strength of schedule ranks a dismal 116th, with an 0-2 mark in Quad 1 contests, suggesting their gaudy numbers may not hold up against stiffer defenses. Arkansas's betting trends further bolster the case for an upset opportunity. The Razorbacks are 10-2 against the spread in their last 12 games overall, demonstrating consistent value for bettors, and they've gone over the total in seven of their last eight outings, aligning with a league trend where SEC games have hit the over 55% of the time when both teams average over 85 points. Georgia, while explosive offensively, has struggled to cover as favorites against quality opponents, going 1-4 ATS in their last five games against teams with winning records. Defensively, the Bulldogs rank in the bottom 100 for defensive rebounding percentage, a vulnerability Arkansas exploits well, ranking near the top 100 in offensive rebounding rate, which has improved during conference play. This rebounding edge could lead to second-chance points in a high-tempo gam, Arkansas ranks 23rd in adjusted tempo, while Georgia sits second nationally—potentially keeping the Razorbacks in contention or even pulling off the win. From a statistical standpoint, Arkansas benefits from superior coaching experience under John Calipari, whose teams have historically performed well as road underdogs in the SEC, covering at a 58% clip over the past five seasons. Georgia's 7-10 ATS record this year underscores their inconsistency, especially at home where they've failed to cover in three of their last five as favorites. With public betting leaning heavily toward Georgia due to their scoring prowess—around 65% of bets on the Bulldogs—the line movement has created positive expected value on Arkansas. Bettors eyeing this matchup should consider the Razorbacks' talent depth and experience as key factors in a potential outright victory. |
||
| Matchup | Selection | W/L |
|
NFL | Jan 17, 2026 49ers vs Seahawks |
UNDER 45½ -118 |
Lost $118.0 |
| Play Type: Premium | ||
|
In the NFC Divisional Round, the San Francisco 49ers face a daunting trip to Seattle to take on the top-seeded Seahawks, with the total set at 45.5 in a matchup that pits a battle-tested road underdog against a rested home favorite. This line has ticked down from an opening of 45.5, and than bounced back up reflecting early action favoring the under, as sharp bettors have pushed it lower amid a league-wide trend of unders cashing in divisional playoff games featuring a No. 1 seed hosting a wild-card winner or road victor from the prior wee, hitting at a 21-9-1 clip (70%) over the last 28 such contests. Seattle's elite defense, which ranked first in the NFL by allowing just 17.2 points per game during the regular season, sets the stage for a potential slog, especially against a 49ers offense that's averaged only 19.8 points in its last five outings and has shown vulnerabilities when missing dynamic playmakers. Diving into team-specific angles, the Seahawks have trended heavily toward unders at home, with nine of their 17 games this season staying below the total, including a 52.9% under rate overall. Their defense led the league with 47 sacks and ranked top-five in yards allowed per game (286), stifling opponents to under 300 total yards in seven of their last 10 wins, while forcing turnovers at a clip of 1.8 per game. League-wide, home favorites off a bye in the divisional round have seen unders cash in low-scoring affairs when their defense ranks in the top tier for points allowed, as rested units like Seattle's often control tempo against fatigued road team, unders going 17-8 (68%) in road covers since 2014, where hosts averaged just 22.9 points. On the flip side, San Francisco's offense has sputtered without wide receiver Deebo Samuel at full strength, posting a 20-16 record all-time in games he's missed and averaging 4.2 fewer yards per play in recent absences, as the unit relies heavily on his versatility for explosive gains. The 49ers went 11-6-1 against the spread overall but just 5-4 on the road in games where their offense was held below 25 points, a mark they've hit in only three of their last six away contests. From a broader playoff perspective, divisional round games involving NFC West rivals have leaned under in eight of the last 12 meetings, with totals averaging 41.2 points when one team boasts a top-five scoring defense like Seattle's. This rivalry underscored that trend in the regular season, where the teams combined for just 30 points in Week 18 (Seattle 13-3 win) and 30 in Week 1 (San Francisco 17-13), as both defenses dominated with pressure rates over 35% and limited big plays. Betting handles show the under as one of the most popular totals this weekend, with ticket counts and money leaning low across multiple markets, particularly in games where the home team has covered four of its last five as a favorite of seven or more. Weather won't be a suppressant here, with clear skies and temperatures in the low 50s at kickoff, but January games in Seattle have historically seen totals dip due to defensive emphasis, with unders hitting 62% in playoff spots at Lumen Field since 2010. San Francisco's road underdog status adds another layer, as they've gone under in six of nine playoff games as visitors, averaging a combined 40.7 points when facing defenses allowing under 20 points per game. Seattle's seven-game win streak to close the regular season featured five games under 40 total points, bolstered by a run defense that allowed just 3.9 yards per carry and ranked second in red-zone efficiency (45.8% touchdown rate allowed). Meanwhile, the 49ers' offense, which ranked eighth in yards per game but 14th in scoring efficiency on the road, has turned the ball over 1.4 times per game in losses this year, a vulnerability that could lead to short fields and stalled drives against a Seahawks unit with 18 interceptions. With public betting split but sharps hammering the under early, pushing the line from 46.5 to 44.5, this feels like a classic defensive grind where points come at a premium, expect a final in the 20-17 range. The pick: Under 44.5 |
||
| Matchup | Selection | W/L |
|
NFL | Jan 17, 2026 Bills vs Broncos |
Broncos -1 -110 at Buckeye |
Won $100 |
| Play Type: Premium | ||
|
In the AFC Divisional Round, the Denver Broncos host the Buffalo Bills in what shapes up as a tightly contested matchup, with Denver laying just 1.5 points at home. This slim spread reflects the respect oddsmakers have for Buffalo's playoff pedigree, but the Broncos' overall profile—bolstered by a dominant regular season and key defensive strength,makes them the side to back here. Denver finished 14-3 straight up, securing the top seed and their first home playoff game in a decade, while Buffalo navigated a 12-5 campaign to earn the sixth seed. Historically, divisional round games with point spreads under 6 points have been competitive, with home teams going 17-15 straight up but only 13-19 against the spread since 2006, highlighting how these close lines often lead to underdog covers. Yet, Denver's home-field edge at altitude could tip the scales, as visiting teams have struggled to adjust in high-elevation playoff spots, and the Broncos went 8-1 at home this year. Delving into team-specific betting trends, Denver's against-the-spread record stands at a middling 7-9-1 overall, but they've shown resilience as small favorites, covering in scenarios where their defense dictates the pace. The Broncos were particularly stingy against the run, allowing a league-low 3.8 yards per carry, which could neutralize Buffalo's ground game and force more pressure on quarterback Josh Allen. League-wide, teams with elite pass rushe, like Denver's unit that led the NFL with 68 sack, have fared well against mobile quarterbacks, often limiting scrambling opportunities and forcing hurried throws. Allen, a dual-threat star, has posted lower passing yards in games against top pressure defenses, averaging under 200 yards in recent matchups with teams like Cleveland and Pittsburgh that rank high in sacks. Buffalo's road inconsistencies add another layer: they finished 5-4 away straight up but just 5-4 against the spread in those games, including some shaky performances against stout fronts. From a broader playoff angle, top seeds like Denver coming off a bye have a mixed bag against the spread, cashing at only a 43% rate since 2003, but No. 1 seeds in the AFC have historically leveraged rest to control tempo in low-scoring affairs. This game fits that mold, with both teams trending toward unders in recent week,Denver's defense ranked third in points allowed (18.3 per game), and Buffalo's offense has been held below 25 points in three of their last five road outings. Additionally, road teams that made the playoffs the previous year, like Buffalo, have a 67% cover rate in divisional rounds when facing rested hosts, but that trend weakens against defenses allowing under 20 points per game, where underdogs drop to 2-3 against the spread in similar spots over the last four seasons. Denver's bye-week preparation under coach Sean Payton, who is 4-0 straight up in playoffs off rest, further supports a narrow home win. Buffalo's resilience can't be ignore, they ousted Denver 31-7 in last year's wild-card round and have won six of their last seven games straight u, but injuries to key defenders like safety Jordan Poyer could expose vulnerabilities against Denver's balanced attack. The Broncos' offense, led by rookie quarterback Bo Nix, averaged 23.6 points per game while committing just 11 turnovers, ranking among the league's best in ball security. In contrast, Buffalo's 9-9 overall against-the-spread mark includes a 50% cover rate as underdogs, but they've gone 0-5 against the spread in playoff games facing defenses allowing fewer than 21 points per game under Allen. With public betting leaning toward Denver on the spread early in the week, as lines flipped from Buffalo favored to Broncos laying points, this feels like a spot where the home team grinds out a 24-21 victory, covering the short number. The pick: Broncos -1.5 |
||
|
PREMIUM PICK STREAKS |
|---|
|
SERVICE BIO |
|---|
|
Experience & Awards I have been wagering professionally on sports and horse racing for 30 years. My picks have been documented for 22 years. I was the 2009 NFL Handicapper of the Year in 2009 in a prestigious event. I won the Ultimate Football NFL Championship in 2006. I have been an NBA World Champion with 9 winning seasons the last 11 years. I also continue to beat the College Hoops book makers with a high volume attack on a yearly basis. Handicapping Approach I have a firm belief in my systems. There is not a sport I feel I can not beat. My handicapping can be best referred to as the 'The Smart Money Approach". I leave no stone unturned. I have a large database of information and statistics. I also take into consideration injuries, current and historical trends, and form. I also factor in the weather, surface conditions, and line movement. Sports Betting Is An Investment Many gamblers offer causal explanations for long runs of good and bad performance. The same is true of financial analysts. The records of bettors and investors show the same variable successes and failures. Both investment opportunities show significant variables and both can give the investor an advantage. You need to do the proper research to consider all the facts. If you do so a long term profit is more than attainable. I think sports betting is even better than the stock market. The investor/bettor has much more control over his funds. You can take a short break, and almost always know your bankroll has not been untouched. In the markets you are leaving your 401K and other mutual investments in the hands of a volatile marketplace. Plus, you are being torched for huge handling fees by brokers on individual investments. These fees would make sports book managers drool. I am not saying it is easy making a living from sports betting. But, the small percent who do consistently beat the books have a much better rate of return than that of any market investor! This is the outlook I have on every wager I place in the sports wagering markets. I take my portfolio very seriously! Money Management To be a successful and profitable sports bettor you must always have a long term goal. Set that standard before you begin. You need to set aside a fairly substantial bankroll. If you want to be conservative you would wager no more than 1-2% of your bankroll per game. No more than 3% on the best bets. This might seem a little on the low side. But, this is a long and turbulent battle with the books. You will be happy that you practiced good money management and frugality. Here are some additional guidelines I recommend. 1. Shop for your best possible lines (rogue lines) from the most reputable sources. 2. Stay disciplined and do not stray from recommended bankroll allocation on individual wagers. Chasing your wagers never a good idea. 3. Always keep in mind that your bankroll is your life line. It must be treated the same way you would treat finances allocated for any business venture. 4. Buy off the hook on key numbers. 5. Understanding the importance and the art of middling. 6. Keep a record of all your wagers and results and use them as part of over all statistical data base. These are some important factors that will help you in your quest for long term profits. I leave you with a thought from the late great Jimmy the Greek. The house does not beat the player, it just gives him the opportunity to beat himself. *All selections have the same allocated bankroll %(which equals 1 betting unit). |
Here are a few more of the NCAA basketball handicappers on our site: